Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Message-ID:	<40609FD8.5030103@ianbrandt.com>
Date:	Tue, 23 Mar 2004 15:36:40 -0500
From:	Ian Brandt <ian AT ianbrandt DOT com>
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.7b) Gecko/20040316
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: Definitely no sshd on FAT32?
References:	<40608855 DOT 8080605 AT ianbrandt DOT com> <Pine DOT GSO DOT 4 DOT 56 DOT 0403231441420 DOT 19995 AT slinky DOT cs DOT nyu DOT edu>
In-Reply-To:	<Pine.GSO.4.56.0403231441420.19995@slinky.cs.nyu.edu>
X-IsSubscribed:	yes

Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
> 
> It is, but it won't be as secure.  See below.
 >
> FYI, "ntsec" is only ignored for the *disk* volumes, but it is used for a
> bunch of other NT-enabled features that have nothing to do with disks
> (e.g., user context switching).  However, "ntsec" is on by default now, so
> you aren't losing this functionality by omitting it.

Good to know.

> Try turning off "StrictModes" in your sshd_config.

Looks like it's already set to no in the installed config.  From man 
sshd_config it looks like StrictModes applies to checks of the home 
directory and files for the user logging in.  I had tried installing the 
service with '-t' option to sshd, but apparently it still does the perm 
checks on the host keys even in test mode.

Regards,

Ian

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -