Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Date:	Thu, 18 Mar 2004 11:46:29 -0500
From:	Christopher Faylor <cgf-no-personal-reply-please AT cygwin DOT com>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: read(): varblk tape records...(& Fix for : read())
Message-ID:	<20040318164629.GD14660@redhat.com>
Reply-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<Sea2-F26DWWcuZcGwM000004e7d AT hotmail DOT com> <20040318091436 DOT GD17229 AT cygbert DOT vinschen DOT de>
Mime-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<20040318091436.GD17229@cygbert.vinschen.de>
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.4.1i

On Thu, Mar 18, 2004 at 10:14:36AM +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>On Mar 18 08:40, Jason Winter wrote:
>>2 days before the question was asked, Corinna had already made the code
>>alteration that the question refered to.  Now who looks stupid.
>
>What is all this justifying yourself good for?  I asked you a question
>because I didn't understand what you were talking about (not for the
>first time, if you scan the thread in the ML archive).  The reply was
>that I should know better.  If I know better, I obviously don't have to
>pay attention to what you're telling.  Fine with me.

FWIW, I think I know better, too.  It takes a while but I do eventually
get it.

That's 2 for 2.

cgf

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -