Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Date:	Wed, 17 Mar 2004 13:26:04 -0500
From:	Christopher Faylor <cgf-no-personal-reply-please AT cygwin DOT com>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: g++ 2.95.3 (FAQ alert)
Message-ID:	<20040317182604.GA8621@redhat.com>
Reply-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<4055E1C9 DOT 30307 AT terra DOT es> <20040315171846 DOT GA23668 AT redhat DOT com> <20040317114342 DOT A23940 AT ns1 DOT iocc DOT com> <20040317175645 DOT GA8173 AT redhat DOT com> <20040317121430 DOT A24666 AT ns1 DOT iocc DOT com>
Mime-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<20040317121430.A24666@ns1.iocc.com>
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.4.1i
Note-from-DJ:	This may be spam

On Wed, Mar 17, 2004 at 12:14:30PM -0600, Joshua Daniel Franklin wrote:
>On Wed, Mar 17, 2004 at 12:56:45PM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>> On Wed, Mar 17, 2004 at 11:43:42AM -0600, Joshua Daniel Franklin wrote:
>> >On Mon, Mar 15, 2004 at 12:18:46PM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>> >> On Mon, Mar 15, 2004 at 06:03:05PM +0100, Luis Valent?n wrote:
>> >> >Where can I find the gcc-g++ 2.95.3 cygwin package ?
>> >> 
>> >> Cygwin used to offer gcc 2.95 but it is no longer available.  Possibly
>> >> it is available on old mirror out there somewhere but there is no
>> >> official support in cygwin.
>> >> 
>> >> Joshua/David, is there any chance that we can get this info into the
>> >> FAQ?
>> >
>> >No. Definitely not. 
>> >
>> >Please see <http://cygwin.com/faq/faq_toc.html#TOC10>
>> 
>> ? This is a generic entry.  Given the number of times this question has
>> been specifically asked, I was thinking it deserved a specific entry, say
>> in the TOC.
>
>Well, it has gcc-2.95 listed in the title:
>
>"Can I use Cygwin Setup to get old versions of packages (like gcc-2.95)?"

Ah.  I guess this must have been in my cache since when I looked at it, it said:
"Can I use Cygwin Setup to update a B18, B19, B20, B20.1 or CD-ROM (1.0) installation of 
Cygwin?"

Now it mentions 2.95, so that addresses my concerns.

Thanks.
--
Please use the resources at cygwin.com rather than sending personal email.
Special for spam email harvesters: send email to aaaspam AT sourceware DOT org
and be permanently blocked from mailing lists at sources.redhat.com

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -