Mail Archives: cygwin/2004/03/15/11:04:09
On Mon, Mar 15, 2004 at 07:32:56AM -0000, Ben Taylor wrote:
>I tried building 3.3.3 using 3.3.1, which didn't work when doing 'make
>bootstrap'. But then I did a successful 'make bootstrap' of 3.3.2
>using 3.3.1. The bootstrapped 3.3.2 works fine, and claims to have
>been compiled by itself not 3.3.1. Even -mno-cygwin works fine on it.
>So I'm now happy, in that I've used my 'on-a-plate' compiler to compile
>myself a better one. But I'm greedy and curious, I want more. So now
>I've included in the path environment variable the path to this before
>the cygwin path, and I'm now trying to make bootstrap 3.3.3 using
>3.3.2. Do you think it should work? When I type 'man patch' it says
>'no manual entry for patch', do I have to install this extra?
>
>And what of this Chris geezer, does he have a known email address? Can
>he be contacted to be asked questions such as this?
You must not be paying attention. I (and others) have been responding
to this thread on the mailing list. To answer your question: I have no
desire to enter into personal dialogs about cygwin. That's why we have
a cygwin mailing list.
Also, just in case it isn't clear, we will eventually be releasing gcc
3.3.3 (and even 3.4), too, so this exercise is pretty much academic.
--
Christopher Faylor
Cygwin Project Leader
Red Hat, Inc.
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
- Raw text -