Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Date:	Sat, 13 Mar 2004 22:49:45 -0500
From:	Christopher Faylor <cgf-no-personal-reply-please AT cygwin DOT com>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: latest snapshot seems better wrt make -j hang problems
Message-ID:	<20040314034945.GA5250@redhat.com>
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<20040313171440 DOT GA7326 AT redhat DOT com> <4053D28D DOT 9000809 AT scytek DOT de>
Mime-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<4053D28D.9000809@scytek.de>
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.4.1i
Reply-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

On Sat, Mar 13, 2004 at 10:33:33PM -0500, Volker Quetschke wrote:
>Christopher Faylor wrote:
>>I have been running the "make -j" cygwin breaker for about ten hours now
>>with no hangs, no segvs, and no strange error exits.
>Me too :-D  it runs without error for 10h with 3300 iterations now.

I've been running for more than 24 hours now with no problems.  But,
this isn't the first time I could claim that so it may not prove
anything.

>>I'm sure this is just because of the magical way in which I have my
>>system set up but could anyone confirm or deny whether that this
>>snapshot behaves better?
>It is definitely better than all snapshots since 1.5.7, thanks!

I think I'll just package this up and ship it, then.  It's certainly
an improvement even if it isn't perfect.

Thanks for the feedback.

cgf

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -