delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
Mailing-List: | contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm |
List-Subscribe: | <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Archive: | <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/> |
List-Post: | <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Help: | <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs> |
Sender: | cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com |
Mail-Followup-To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
Delivered-To: | mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
Date: | Sat, 13 Mar 2004 12:14:40 -0500 |
From: | Christopher Faylor <cgf-no-personal-reply-please AT cygwin DOT com> |
To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
Subject: | latest snapshot seems better wrt make -j hang problems |
Message-ID: | <20040313171440.GA7326@redhat.com> |
Mail-Followup-To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
Mime-Version: | 1.0 |
User-Agent: | Mutt/1.4.1i |
Reply-To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
I have been running the "make -j" cygwin breaker for about ten hours now with no hangs, no segvs, and no strange error exits. I'm sure this is just because of the magical way in which I have my system set up but could anyone confirm or deny whether that this snapshot behaves better? If it does still die then an strace of the failing case would be helpful. If it is too large for the mailing list software then let me know and I'll arrange to get the strace via some other mechanism -- i.e., via a brand new cygwin bugzilla setup. cgf -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |