delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi   search  
Mail Archives: cygwin/2004/03/05/13:18:47

Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Date: Fri, 5 Mar 2004 12:18:29 -0600
From: Gregory Borota <not-valid AT cygwin DOT com>
Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: Email Mangling
In-Reply-To: <20040305151120.GC4036@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.CYG.4.58.0403051217001.120@lap>
References: <Pine DOT CYG DOT 4 DOT 58 DOT 0403050248110 DOT 596 AT lap> <Pine DOT GSO DOT 4 DOT 56 DOT 0403050811040 DOT 11159 AT slinky DOT cs DOT nyu DOT edu> <20040305151120 DOT GC4036 AT redhat DOT com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Note-from-DJ: This may be spam

http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2004-03/msg00245.html
http://cygwin.com/cgi-bin/get-raw-msg?listname=cygwin&date=2004-03&msgid=Pine.CYG.4.58.0403041424140.812%40lap

On Fri, 5 Mar 2004, Christopher Faylor wrote:

> On Fri, Mar 05, 2004 at 08:12:29AM -0500, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
> >On Fri, 5 Mar 2004, Gregory Borota wrote:
> >>Looking at the headers for a message I sent recently (id 89248) I see
> >>that my email address was not mutilated in the Received: field.  If one
> >>uses SBC Yahoo's smtp server he has his email address as username.
> >>
> >>If this is a very isolated incident then maybe nobody should bother.
> >>If not maybe it should.  I personally no longer care, I changed the
> >>smtp server, just wanted to point this out (don't know if this subject
> >>already discussed, too many hits for sbc yahoo if googling the
> >>archive).
> >
> >Since the raw text is generated by a CGI script, steps could be taken
> >to block spam harvesters from even seeing it...  OTOH, it might be
> >easier to just run the substitution on the Received: header...
>
> Since 89248 is not a URL, I am not sure what we're talking about here.
> I looked at a couple of messages and don't see anything other than
> cygwin AT cygwin DOT com in the received lines, which sort of makes sense.
>
> cgf

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -


  webmaster     delorie software   privacy  
  Copyright © 2019   by DJ Delorie     Updated Jul 2019