Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Message-Id:	<6.0.1.1.0.20040302193614.01eec5f0@imap.myrealbox.com>
X-Sender:	tprince AT imap DOT myrealbox DOT com
Date:	Tue, 02 Mar 2004 19:39:15 -0800
To:	Erick Castillo <erick AT hitachissi DOT com>, cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
From:	Tim Prince <tprince AT computer DOT org>
Subject:	Re: gcc 2.95_
In-Reply-To:	<loom.20040302T235423-410@post.gmane.org>
References:	<loom DOT 20040302T214823-156 AT post DOT gmane DOT org> <c230nf$7lm$1 AT sea DOT gmane DOT org> <loom DOT 20040302T235423-410 AT post DOT gmane DOT org>
Mime-Version:	1.0
X-IsSubscribed:	yes

At 02:58 PM 3/2/2004, Erick Castillo wrote:



>You're absolutely right, gcc version 3.3 does work fine. The problem I'm 
>having
>is specific to the software I am trying to compile. The application i have
>compiles with older versions of the compiler and this is why I'm looking for
>older ones. So one last question... did v2.96 meet the same fate as v2.95?
>

No, gcc-2.96 was a red hat release, not a gnu release.  I never saw it 
appear on cygwin, nor any OS other than those put out by Red Hat.  Some of 
the versions were mighty buggy.


Tim Prince 


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -