delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi   search  
Mail Archives: cygwin/2004/03/02/19:03:30

Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
X-Authentication-Warning: slinky.cs.nyu.edu: pechtcha owned process doing -bs
Date: Tue, 2 Mar 2004 19:03:13 -0500 (EST)
From: Igor Pechtchanski <pechtcha AT cs DOT nyu DOT edu>
Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
To: Erick Castillo <erick AT hitachissi DOT com>
cc: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: gcc =?utf-8?b?Mi45NV8=?=
In-Reply-To: <loom.20040302T235423-410@post.gmane.org>
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.56.0403021857560.17984@slinky.cs.nyu.edu>
References: <loom DOT 20040302T214823-156 AT post DOT gmane DOT org> <c230nf$7lm$1 AT sea DOT gmane DOT org> <loom DOT 20040302T235423-410 AT post DOT gmane DOT org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.39

On Tue, 2 Mar 2004, Erick Castillo wrote:

> Rolf Campbell <Endlisnis <at> mailc.net> writes:
>
> > gcc version 3.3 works fine, gcc v2.95 was broken on cygwin and nobody
> > wanted to fix it, so it was discontinued.
> >
> > Erick Castillo wrote:
> > > Need to install gcc 2.95 on the latest cygwin release. gcc version 3.3... does
> > > not work properly. Where could i find 2.95 if not through the simple cygwin
> > > install wizard? Will version 2.95 even work on the latest cygwin release? Any
> > > information on this would be incredibly useful. thanks.
> > >
> > > --Erick Castillo
>
> You're absolutely right, gcc version 3.3 does work fine. The problem I'm having
> is specific to the software I am trying to compile. The application i have
> compiles with older versions of the compiler and this is why I'm looking for
> older ones. So one last question... did v2.96 meet the same fate as v2.95?
>
> By the way, thanks a million for the response. You saved me several hours.
>
> --Erick Castillo

Erick,

There was no 2.96.  The last Cygwin-specific release of gcc2 was 2.95.3-10.
If you absolutely need 2.95, I'm sure the Cygwin-specific sources are
still floating around[*], and you should be able to build from them.  It
might even work, unless you hit one of the bugs that influenced the
decision to dump it in the first place.
	Igor
[*] Hint: Google for "gcc2-2.95.3-10-src.tar.bz2"
-- 
				http://cs.nyu.edu/~pechtcha/
      |\      _,,,---,,_		pechtcha AT cs DOT nyu DOT edu
ZZZzz /,`.-'`'    -.  ;-;;,_		igor AT watson DOT ibm DOT com
     |,4-  ) )-,_. ,\ (  `'-'		Igor Pechtchanski, Ph.D.
    '---''(_/--'  `-'\_) fL	a.k.a JaguaR-R-R-r-r-r-.-.-.  Meow!

"I have since come to realize that being between your mentor and his route
to the bathroom is a major career booster."  -- Patrick Naughton

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -


  webmaster     delorie software   privacy  
  Copyright © 2019   by DJ Delorie     Updated Jul 2019