Mail Archives: cygwin/2004/02/28/16:21:13
Larry,
I see that I've caused you some concern. Let me be more specific. Not
being familiar with Cygwin "snapshots", I was tending to equate the term
with what might go by the name "daily builds" in other projects. Folks
are often warned that these are less stable then the "current stable
release" and that care should be exercised.
Chuck
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Larry Hall
> Sent: Saturday, February 28, 2004 2:39 PM
> To: Chuck Irvine
> Cc: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
> Subject: RE: Control-c not working in rxvt (for exiting jboss server)
>
>
> At 02:08 PM 2/28/2004, Chuck Irvine you wrote:
> >I'm a little hesitant to go to the latest snapshot since I rely on
> >cygwin for many things. Do you think it is as safe as the current
> >version?
>
>
> What does that mean? What makes the "current version"
> "safe"? You are implying something here by your vagueness.
> The implications, more than likely, aren't synonymous with
> your intent. But you need to be more
> clear with your question if you expect to get any kind of
> meaningful answer.
>
>
> --
> Larry Hall http://www.rfk.com
> RFK Partners, Inc. (508) 893-9779 - RFK Office
> 838 Washington Street (508) 893-9889 - FAX
> Holliston, MA 01746
>
>
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
- Raw text -