delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi   search  
Mail Archives: cygwin/2004/02/26/20:28:46

Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2004 20:28:07 -0500
From: Christopher Faylor <cgf-no-personal-reply-please AT cygwin DOT com>
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: Good news for cygwin ? Re: [smartmontools-devel]Windows port
Message-ID: <20040227012807.GA6039@redhat.com>
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References: <Pine DOT LNX DOT 4 DOT 58 DOT 0402172028010 DOT 670 AT pervalidus DOT dyndns DOT org> <403A5C6F DOT 30806 AT t-online DOT de> <Pine DOT CYG DOT 4 DOT 58 DOT 0402231819150 DOT 3120 AT pervalidus> <Pine DOT LNX DOT 4 DOT 58 DOT 0402262002360 DOT 354 AT pervalidus DOT dyndns DOT org> <20040227000625 DOT GA4795 AT redhat DOT com> <Pine DOT LNX DOT 4 DOT 58 DOT 0402262112180 DOT 354 AT pervalidus DOT dyndns DOT org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0402262112180.354@pervalidus.dyndns.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

On Thu, Feb 26, 2004 at 09:44:20PM -0300, Fr?d?ric L. W. Meunier wrote:
>On Thu, 26 Feb 2004, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>>On Thu, Feb 26, 2004 at 08:09:54PM -0300, Fr?d?ric L. W. Meunier wrote:
>>>smartmontools now has support for Cygwin in CVS. There's a full
>>>package I made for 1.5.7 (just missed a postinstall script for
>>>/etc/smartd.conf - will be in 5.30) that can be installed
>>>through setup.exe.
>>>
>>>And a smartctl binary compiled with -mno-cygwin.
>>
>>...which would make it not particularly good news for cygwin...
>
>Correct, but I consider it good news if you have Cygwin, don't
>have MinGW, can't afford MSVC, and also want to make a native
>Windows binary.

"Don't have MinGW" doesn't make much sense.  If you are careful you
don't need anything specific to MinGW to run binaries compiled with it.

>>-mno-cygwin means "no cygwin" which means that cygwin is not involved
>>in this port at all.  You used cygwin's compiler to build it but you
>>cut cygwin out of the equation by specifying -mno-cygwin, making it
>>essentially a native windows port like you'd get if you used MSVC.
>
>Yes, but that was only to provide a smartctl binary for non Cygwin
>users.  smartd hasn't yet been ported by Christian because -mno-cygwin
>and MSVC lack at least syslog.h, but it works with Cygwin.

So you're talking about mixing binaries compiled with and without
cygwin.  Hmm.

>May I ask why /bin/mail isn't in Cygwin ? Nobody volunteered ?
>http://www.cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2003-07/msg00460.html doesn't
>help.

Basically it's because we thought you might need it and we're all
really mean so we're purposely not including it.

cgf

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -


  webmaster     delorie software   privacy  
  Copyright © 2019   by DJ Delorie     Updated Jul 2019