Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
From:	"Totte Karlsson" <totte AT codeschack DOT com>
Subject:	Re: vi and cygwin
Date:	Sat, 21 Feb 2004 17:17:58 -0800
Lines:	20
Message-ID:	<c1900c$ua7$1@sea.gmane.org>
References:	<F67AB1DD14544242BE5BFE94F5939175B7F296 AT E2KMEMMCS1 DOT ftbco DOT ftn DOT com> <c162uh$f3h$1 AT sea DOT gmane DOT org> <qn16hsj6zk05 DOT dlg AT thorstenkampe DOT de> <c16c1h$de$1 AT sea DOT gmane DOT org> <1cl6bsb1q1y8w DOT dlg AT thorstenkampe DOT de>
Reply-To:	"Totte Karlsson" <totte AT codeschack DOT com>
X-Complaints-To:	usenet AT sea DOT gmane DOT org
X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host:	ip68-111-237-86.sd.sd.cox.net
X-Newsreader:	Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106

OK, you are correct, vim is vi! ...it's just spelled different I guess..
....

"Thorsten Kampe" <thorsten AT thorstenkampe DOT de> wrote in message
news:1cl6bsb1q1y8w DOT dlg AT thorstenkampe DOT de...
> * Totte Karlsson (2004-02-21 02:25 +0100)
> > does not mean that vim is vi! Read my question!
>
> Read my answer: vim behaves like vi, it is called with "vi" in the
> shell and therefor it /is/ vi
(http://www.netbsd.org/Misc/call-it-a-duck.html).
>
> The original vi is not free software so you will hardly find it on any
> Linux machine (same with ksh for example).
>
> Thorsten
>
>




--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -