Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Date:	Fri, 20 Feb 2004 22:19:09 -0800 (PST)
From:	"Peter A. Castro" <doctor AT fruitbat DOT org>
To:	Jason Tishler <jason AT tishler DOT net>
cc:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: when to rebase?
In-Reply-To:	<20040221003701.GD2296@tishler.net>
Message-ID:	<Pine.LNX.4.53.0402202212000.30590@gremlin.fruitbat.org>
References:	<OF09D54DAA DOT 700A514F-ON85256E40 DOT 0064FCA7-85256E40 DOT 00651189 AT us DOT ibm DOT com> <6 DOT 0 DOT 1 DOT 1 DOT 0 DOT 20040220132713 DOT 0391c768 AT 127 DOT 0 DOT 0 DOT 1> <20040220203215 DOT GC2296 AT tishler DOT net> <Pine DOT LNX DOT 4 DOT 53 DOT 0402201247440 DOT 30590 AT gremlin DOT fruitbat DOT org> <20040221003701 DOT GD2296 AT tishler DOT net>
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-IsSubscribed:	yes

On Fri, 20 Feb 2004, Jason Tishler wrote:

> Peter,
>
> On Fri, Feb 20, 2004 at 12:52:28PM -0800, Peter A. Castro wrote:
> > On Fri, 20 Feb 2004, Jason Tishler wrote:
> > > Unfortunately, rebasing apparently breaks zsh:
> > >
> > >     http://www.cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2003-12/msg00415.html
> >
> > As the zsh maintainer, I'm still waiting for the rebase and gcc
> > maintainers to make a ruling on just where the problem is.  See:
> >
> > http://www.cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2004-02/msg00573.html
>
> FWIW, I just tried the above with Microsoft's rebase and observed the
> same behavior.  Note this is not a "ruling" just another data point.

Well, considering what the root problem is, I wouldn't expect MS's rebase
to work any better than the cygwin version.  However, I would like to see
some cooperation on how to resolve it.  This problem is not specific to
zsh.  It has more to do with how exported symbols are treated/managed.
I'd almost propose that rebase change such symbols' value, being rebase
is the one changing the image base of the dll in the first place.
However, I would really like to understand why this symbol exists and if
there is some way to eliminate it and use the dll's real image base
instead.

> Jason

-- 
Peter A. Castro <doctor AT fruitbat DOT org> or <Peter DOT Castro AT oracle DOT com>
	"Cats are just autistic Dogs" -- Dr. Tony Attwood

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -