Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Date:	Fri, 20 Feb 2004 12:00:51 -0500
From:	Christopher Faylor <cgf-no-personal-reply-please AT cygwin DOT com>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: Can't get list of download sites
Message-ID:	<20040220170051.GE5195@redhat.com>
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<476AFB33B6D50B4286FB94A671FC779E039237 AT coxml1 DOT cox DOT co DOT uk>
Mime-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<476AFB33B6D50B4286FB94A671FC779E039237@coxml1.cox.co.uk>
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.4.1i
X-IsSubscribed:	yes
Reply-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

On Fri, Feb 20, 2004 at 04:32:32PM -0000, Hughes, Bill wrote:
>>Sent: 20 February 2004 13:42 From: Christopher Faylor
>>
>>I suppose that theory will be corroborated soon as the complaints flood
>>into this mailing list.  Or not.
>>
>>FWIW, WFM.
>
>I didn't parse this last correctly as standard acronyms and thought cgf
>was having an even worse day than usual and had escalated WJM to the
>next level...  Have a nice weekend,

If I am understanding your misinterpretation correctly you can rest
assured that I try hard to avoid the use of or implication of profanity
in my messages although I'm sure an occasional RT?M has slipped by.

However, that said, for the longest time, I habitually read WFM as
exactly what I think you think it means.

cgf

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -