Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
MIME-Version:	1.0
Subject:	RE: 20040217 snapshot problem
Date:	Thu, 19 Feb 2004 09:51:01 -0500
Message-ID:	<C1A7FA5F2793A94BA223673B8ADAF4A139054C@exchange.atl.air2web.com>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
From:	"Richard Campbell" <richard DOT campbell AT air2web DOT com>
To:	<cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
X-IsSubscribed:	yes
X-MIME-Autoconverted:	from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id i1JEpbe3018367

>There are some changes in the latest snapshot that may make inetd
>work better.  I tracked down a stupid error that I'd introduced after
>1.5.7.

Under the 20040218 snapshot, when trying to start X, inetd does not spin 
out of control CPU-wise.

However, XWin.exe does not start.

I tried "strace -o strace_out --mask=all XWin.exe":

20040217 - 0 bytes of output in strace_out
20040218 - 0 bytes of output in strace_out
1.5.7-1  - 2 megabytes of output in strace_out, roughly, after shutting down X at the 
	first opportunity.

-Richard Campbell.

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -