Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Date:	Thu, 19 Feb 2004 00:28:16 -0500
From:	Christopher Faylor <cgf-no-personal-reply-please AT cygwin DOT com>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: 20040217 snapshot problem
Message-ID:	<20040219052816.GB11421@redhat.com>
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<C1A7FA5F2793A94BA223673B8ADAF4A1390543 AT exchange DOT atl DOT air2web DOT com>
Mime-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<C1A7FA5F2793A94BA223673B8ADAF4A1390543@exchange.atl.air2web.com>
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.4.1i
X-IsSubscribed:	yes
Reply-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

On Wed, Feb 18, 2004 at 11:23:02AM -0500, Richard Campbell wrote:
>> Is this a regression from 20040216 or some other snapshot?
>
>Unless there are earlier post 1.5.7-1 snapshots than 20040205, no.
>
>I just ran through the 20040205-20040216 snapshots:
>
>20040216 - same result as 20040217
>20040215 - exception violation at x00000005 or similar.  affects all cygwin programs, not 
>	just XWin.exe
>20040214 - same result as 20040217
>20040213 - same result as 20040217
>20040206 - same result as 20040217
>20040205 - same result as 20040217

There are some changes in the latest snapshot that may make inetd
work better.  I tracked down a stupid error that I'd introduced after
1.5.7.

cgf

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -