Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Date:	Tue, 17 Feb 2004 15:01:31 -0500
From:	Christopher Faylor <cgf-no-personal-reply-please AT cygwin DOT com>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: EMACS problems with cygwin 1.5.7.1
Message-ID:	<20040217200130.GA32302@redhat.com>
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<OFCCB6EA0F DOT BBF42E98-ON85256E3D DOT 006819C4-85256E3D DOT 006B2857 AT us DOT ibm DOT com>
Mime-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<OFCCB6EA0F.BBF42E98-ON85256E3D.006819C4-85256E3D.006B2857@us.ibm.com>
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.4.1i
X-IsSubscribed:	yes
Reply-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

On Tue, Feb 17, 2004 at 02:30:25PM -0500, Thomas L Roche wrote:
>That being said, emacs is still not nearly as stable now as it was on
>1.5.5-1--in fact, I got an exit 128 (haven't seen one of those before,
>usually it's just SEGVs) while composing this reply. So while I don't
>believe Plager's response (dropping back to 1.5.5-1) was optimal, I
>can see why one might choose that route.  Instead I hope to debug emacs
>after the unzip problem (which more directly harms my productivity) is
>fixed

I don't know if I have mentioned this but since I don't use emacs,
barring any debugging of the problem or reproducible test case, this
breakage will also be in cygwin 1.5.8.  If you or someone is going to
debug this then it will have to be quick.

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -