delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi   search  
Mail Archives: cygwin/2004/02/17/11:00:20

Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2004 10:59:57 -0500
From: Christopher Faylor <cgf-no-personal-reply-please AT cygwin DOT com>
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: cygwin Mailing list
Message-ID: <20040217155957.GB22509@redhat.com>
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References: <200402170321 DOT i1H3LHUL008029 AT smtp3 DOT adl2 DOT internode DOT on DOT net> <40320367 DOT 9080600 AT cs DOT york DOT ac DOT uk> <40320B4D DOT 2080407 AT luukku DOT com> <Pine DOT GSO DOT 4 DOT 56 DOT 0402170845220 DOT 26191 AT slinky DOT cs DOT nyu DOT edu>
Mime-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.56.0402170845220.26191@slinky.cs.nyu.edu>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

On Tue, Feb 17, 2004 at 08:51:43AM -0500, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
>> Now if you just think of "quality" of posts where just is said "This has
>> been discussed, search archives". Well if bother to reply at all, why
>> not bring some content, e.g. title of thread that discussion were. Oh
>> wait... but that would take few more words to type, and of course, it
>> would be too informative, note that still this is _cygwin_ list, an
>> cygwin is not for newbies. (*evil grin*).
>
>Ooh, ooh, have we got ourselves a new catchphrase here?  CGF?  Maybe even
>an acronym: "CINFN"? :-)

Sounds good to me.  Even though it's not true.  I'd say that most of this list
is devoted to "newbies", whether they are debugging newbies, gcc newbies,
postgres newbies, ssh newbies, etc.

>>>While I do not claim any kind of authority, could I suggest perhaps a)
>>>being a little nicer to newbies (it isn't that hard really) and b) if
>>>you feel the need for a post without any useful content (perhaps just
>>>saying "search the archives") to send it just to the author of the mail
>>>in question?
>>
>>Well, it's not anything about authority, just basic manners when
>>dealing...  Hmm, you could say "customer support" here...
>
>Yep, customer support is worth every dollar you pay for it.

Yep.  Perhaps unsurprisingly, I was about to type in the same thing.  It
seems to be a very frequent case that people assume a burden of
obligation flowing to them when they download something from a free
software product.  Cygwin seems to suffer from this outlook more than
most projects I've seen, maybe because we're not just providing source,
we're providing binaries.

And, then, we are also running on Windows, so there is a Windows mindset
to deal with, too.

>from std::string, I'm sure you and RedHat can work something out.  The
>"core" people mentioned above are too busy fixing Cygwin bugs (or
>shielding others from repeated questions so they can fix Cygwin bugs).

I don't think I've thanked the people here who diligently answer
questions.  I may be mean but don't think for a second that I don't
thank God every day that you are all donating your time to help the
newbies.  It's really impressive how responsive and helpful you all
are.

cgf

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -


  webmaster     delorie software   privacy  
  Copyright © 2019   by DJ Delorie     Updated Jul 2019