Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Message-Id:	<200402171341.i1HDfewo045407@smtp1.adl2.internode.on.net>
From:	"Gareth Pearce" <tilps AT probablyprime DOT net>
To:	<cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Subject:	RE: Cygwin Mailing list
Date:	Wed, 18 Feb 2004 00:41:36 +1100
MIME-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<40320367.9080600@cs.york.ac.uk>
X-IsSubscribed:	yes

> While I do not claim any kind of authority, could I suggest perhaps a)
> being a little nicer to newbies (it isn't that hard really) and b) if
> you feel the need for a post without any useful content (perhaps just
> saying "search the archives") to send it just to the author of the mail
> in question?

Heh I'm sick, guess I shouldn't be replying to email messages.

I actually didn't mean to send that email, since Larry had sent a 'nicer'
reply already. But I knocked my finger on the table edge as I slid my mouse
to the file menu and got the send button instead.  But given the fact he/she
followed up with an SFU reprisal immediately afterwards, which was judged
offtopic last time and this time consisted purely of a copy paste with No
content whatsoever), I'm not feeling all that guilty right now.

However by responding to this, I'm being just as bad, since this kind of
thread is Way old hat.

Gareth



--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -