delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi   search  
Mail Archives: cygwin/2004/02/16/22:09:20

Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
X-Authentication-Warning: slinky.cs.nyu.edu: pechtcha owned process doing -bs
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2004 22:09:07 -0500 (EST)
From: Igor Pechtchanski <pechtcha AT cs DOT nyu DOT edu>
Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
To: "Pierre A. Humblet" <Pierre DOT Humblet AT ieee DOT org>
cc: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com, tlroche AT us DOT ibm DOT com
Subject: Re: failure of unzip and recent cygwin1.dll
In-Reply-To: <3.0.5.32.20040216213234.007fa580@incoming.verizon.net>
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.56.0402162154380.26191@slinky.cs.nyu.edu>
References: <OFF0DB63A0 DOT 1B9D77F6-ON85256E3C DOT 005FA048-85256E3C DOT 0060B3C4 AT us DOT ibm DOT com> <OFF0DB63A0 DOT 1B9D77F6-ON85256E3C DOT 005FA048-85256E3C DOT 0060B3C4 AT us DOT ibm DOT com> <3 DOT 0 DOT 5 DOT 32 DOT 20040216213234 DOT 007fa580 AT incoming DOT verizon DOT net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.39

On Mon, 16 Feb 2004, Pierre A. Humblet wrote:

> At 01:20 PM 2/16/2004 -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> >On Mon, Feb 16, 2004 at 12:36:14PM -0500, Thomas L Roche wrote:
> >>
> >>No, I have discovered considerably more. Consequently my question is,
> >>is the path_conv bad?
> >
> >What you are debugging is the consequences of cmalloc being NULL.  While
> >that may illustrate that cygwin should recover more robustly from such a
> >situation, it is not directly related to the problem at hand, namely,
> >"Why is cmalloc returning NULL?"
>
> I noticed that a) Thomas' file names are unusually long and
> b) path_conv::set_normalized_path calls cmalloc only for long paths.
>
> Thus I decided to check if the normalized path is correctly freed.
> That would explain why cmalloc is returning NULL.
> As far as I can see, it isn't freed, at least not all the time.
> When running /bin/ls very_long_path I see 4 allocs and 2 frees.
>
> However I don't find an obvious bug and I don't have the time to pursue
> this for the moment.
>
> Pierre

If I read the code correctly, normalized_path has to be explicitly freed.
One of the places normalized_path is freed is in conv_path_list_buf_size,
and the cfree is followed by the following FIXME comment:

	cfree (pc.normalized_path);
	// FIXME - probably should be in a destructor but
	// it's hard to justify a destructor for the few
	// places where this is needed

I believe a destructor would be cleaner, and the current code obviously
misses at least one more place where this is needed.  Unfortunately, with
my copyright assignment in flux, I can't send in a patch.  If noone fixes
this by the time I can send patches, I'll try to send in a fix for this.
	Igor
-- 
				http://cs.nyu.edu/~pechtcha/
      |\      _,,,---,,_		pechtcha AT cs DOT nyu DOT edu
ZZZzz /,`.-'`'    -.  ;-;;,_		igor AT watson DOT ibm DOT com
     |,4-  ) )-,_. ,\ (  `'-'		Igor Pechtchanski, Ph.D.
    '---''(_/--'  `-'\_) fL	a.k.a JaguaR-R-R-r-r-r-.-.-.  Meow!

"I have since come to realize that being between your mentor and his route
to the bathroom is a major career booster."  -- Patrick Naughton

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -


  webmaster     delorie software   privacy  
  Copyright © 2019   by DJ Delorie     Updated Jul 2019