delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
Mailing-List: | contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm |
List-Subscribe: | <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Archive: | <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/> |
List-Post: | <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Help: | <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs> |
Sender: | cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com |
Mail-Followup-To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
Delivered-To: | mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
Date: | Sat, 14 Feb 2004 20:10:53 -0600 |
From: | Chuck Irvine <crirvine AT everestkc DOT net> |
Subject: | Why choice between unix and dos line endings? |
To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
Message-id: | <001e01c3f368$f3bddac0$6500a8c0@Ray> |
MIME-version: | 1.0 |
Something I've never been able to figure out is why Cygwin offers to install with the choice of either dos or unix line endings. The way I see it is that using dos line endings allows for good integration with native windows apps. I can see no advantage of using unix line endings, though I guess there must be one otherwise the option wouldn't be offered. Can any one shed some light on this. Thanks Chuck -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |