Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Date:	Sat, 14 Feb 2004 10:39:00 -0500
From:	Christopher Faylor <cgf-no-personal-reply-please AT cygwin DOT com>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: 20040214 snapshot is better (was DO NOT USE the 20040213 snapshot)
Message-ID:	<20040214153859.GA18912@redhat.com>
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mime-Version:	1.0
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.4.1i
X-IsSubscribed:	yes
Reply-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

On Sat, Feb 14, 2004 at 12:25:32AM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>On Fri, Feb 13, 2004 at 09:55:25PM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>>On Fri, Feb 13, 2004 at 09:45:47PM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>>>On Fri, Feb 13, 2004 at 06:58:42PM -0500, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
>>>>The above messages might indicate that there is more than one version of
>>>>the cygwin DLL on your system.
>>>
>>>Sometimes it does.  In this case, it indicates a problem with the
>>>snapshot.  I did a fair amount of testing on this version of cygwin but,
>>>as sometimes happens, it failed in the field.
>>
>>Just thought I'd make it clear that the current snapshot is broken.
>>
>>Apologies for any inconvenience I caused to anyone who downloaded it.
>
>The 20040214 snapshot passes the test suite, so it is demonstrably better
>than the 20040213 snapshot.
>
>Please try it out.

http://cygwin.com/snapshots/

cgf

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -