Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
From:	Shankar Unni <shankarunni AT netscape DOT net>
Subject:	Re: Different executables of the same source
Date:	Thu, 12 Feb 2004 13:24:48 -0800
Lines:	10
Message-ID:	<c0gqv0$7j6$1@sea.gmane.org>
References:	<8D861ADC5B8FD211B4100008C71EA7DA04F7140D AT kjsdemucshrexc1 DOT eu DOT pm DOT com> <c0c593$2mo$1 AT sea DOT gmane DOT org> <c0cbmb$d8e$1 AT sea DOT gmane DOT org> <402A71FC DOT 8040501 AT netscape DOT net> <Pine DOT GSO DOT 4 DOT 58 DOT 0402111236400 DOT 25734 AT thing1-200>
Mime-Version:	1.0
X-Complaints-To:	usenet AT sea DOT gmane DOT org
X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host:	adsl-64-165-207-59.dsl.snfc21.pacbell.net
User-Agent:	Mozilla Thunderbird 0.5 (Windows/20040207)
In-Reply-To:	<Pine.GSO.4.58.0402111236400.25734@thing1-200>

Brian Ford wrote:

> gcc doesn't create .o or .exe files.  as/ld do respectively :).

Of course. There *are* gcc ports that don't use binutils, I know - I've 
done gcc ports. But most "regular folks" think of "gcc" as a monolithic 
compiler suite.

Anyway, I'll probably report this on the binutils list if I find the 
time. It's purely cosmetic..


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -