Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
From:	Shankar Unni <shankarunni AT netscape DOT net>
Subject:	Re: Different executables of the same source
Date:	Tue, 10 Feb 2004 18:50:11 -0800
Lines:	9
Message-ID:	<c0c593$2mo$1@sea.gmane.org>
References:	<8D861ADC5B8FD211B4100008C71EA7DA04F7140D AT kjsdemucshrexc1 DOT eu DOT pm DOT com>
Mime-Version:	1.0
X-Complaints-To:	usenet AT sea DOT gmane DOT org
X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host:	adsl-64-165-207-59.dsl.snfc21.pacbell.net
User-Agent:	Mozilla Thunderbird 0.5 (Windows/20040207)
In-Reply-To:	<8D861ADC5B8FD211B4100008C71EA7DA04F7140D@kjsdemucshrexc1.eu.pm.com>

Demmer, Thomas wrote:

> Because the PE header has a field that contains
> the creation time. Due to this "feature" the MD5-sums
> of executables compiled on two different machines will hardly ever
> concide. I have no clue why this feature exists.

Almost *all* object file formats (ELF, COFF/PE, ...) have such headers, 
to tell you when and where it was built.


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -