delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi   search  
Mail Archives: cygwin/2004/02/05/21:14:23

Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
X-Authentication-Warning: mdssdev05.comp.pge.com: esp5 set sender to esp5 AT pge DOT com using -f
Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2004 18:10:38 -0800
From: "Edward S. Peschko" <esp5 AT pge DOT com>
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: ldd equivalent
Message-ID: <20040206021038.GA26483@mdssdev05.comp.pge.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i
X-IsSubscribed: yes

hey,

I was wondering if - when you ran cygcheck - it gave equivalent output to 
ldd.

If so, why isn't it called ldd?

If not, what's the equivalent?

I see mention of an 'ldd-like script' in

http://sources.redha.com/ml/binutils/2002-09/msg00353.html

but unfortunately, the link internal to the message seems to be broken.


Ed

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -


  webmaster     delorie software   privacy  
  Copyright © 2019   by DJ Delorie     Updated Jul 2019