delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
Mailing-List: | contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm |
List-Subscribe: | <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Archive: | <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/> |
List-Post: | <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Help: | <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs> |
Sender: | cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com |
Mail-Followup-To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
Delivered-To: | mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
X-Authentication-Warning: | mdssdev05.comp.pge.com: esp5 set sender to esp5 AT pge DOT com using -f |
Date: | Thu, 5 Feb 2004 18:10:38 -0800 |
From: | "Edward S. Peschko" <esp5 AT pge DOT com> |
To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
Subject: | ldd equivalent |
Message-ID: | <20040206021038.GA26483@mdssdev05.comp.pge.com> |
Mime-Version: | 1.0 |
User-Agent: | Mutt/1.4.1i |
X-IsSubscribed: | yes |
hey, I was wondering if - when you ran cygcheck - it gave equivalent output to ldd. If so, why isn't it called ldd? If not, what's the equivalent? I see mention of an 'ldd-like script' in http://sources.redha.com/ml/binutils/2002-09/msg00353.html but unfortunately, the link internal to the message seems to be broken. Ed -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |