Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Message-Id:	<200401291807.i0TI73qd001876@guild.plethora.net>
From:	seebs AT plethora DOT net (Peter Seebach)
Reply-To:	seebs AT plethora DOT net (Peter Seebach)
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: Question about ash and getopts
In-reply-to:	Your message of "Thu, 29 Jan 2004 11:04:19 +0100." <20040129100419.GI1572@cygbert.vinschen.de>
Date:	Thu, 29 Jan 2004 12:07:03 -0600
X-IsSubscribed:	yes

In message <20040129100419 DOT GI1572 AT cygbert DOT vinschen DOT de>, Corinna Vinschen writes
:
>On Jan 29 01:32, Peter Seebach wrote:
>> In message <6 DOT 0 DOT 1 DOT 1 DOT 0 DOT 20040101134614 DOT 037899e8 AT 127 DOT 0 DOT 0 DOT 1>, Larry Hall writes:
>> >I provided my suggestion, which Peter followed.  It's the ash maintainer 
>> >that has the final word on what, if anything, happens next and/or what
>> >the criteria should be.
>> 
>> Just a follow-up on this:  I'm doing an article on "portable scripting",
>> so if anything is happening, I'd like to know about it so I can tell people
>
>http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2004-01/msg01160.html

Thanks much!  Missed that one.

-s

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -