Mail Archives: cygwin/2004/01/28/20:38:12
ok ok, I simplified the explanation a bit, remember it was in brackets at
the bottom of a mail describing the solution to the questioner's problem. (I
have no idea how technical the questioner is, and he'd have to be pretty
technical to understand your explanation ;-) )
I don't know whether it was just cygwin that separated the packages or
whether that's how gcc is recommended to be distributed now, but they *are*
separate packages now. (in the cygwin world that I'm a part of, and the
questioner is a part of) And I'm not saying they are independent of one
another, obviously g++ depends on the core gcc package.
Regards
---------------------------------
Q-Games, Dylan Cuthbert.
http://www.q-games.com
"Dave Korn" <dk at artimi dot com> wrote in message
news:NUTMEGCNCUgpCfZdEla00000031 AT NUTMEG DOT CAM DOT ARTIMI DOT COM...
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: cygwin-owner On Behalf Of Dylan Cuthbert
>
--- explanation snipped ---
>
> Here endeth the lesson on the internal structure of gcc and compiler
> terminology. Hope it was at least mildly interesting.
>
>
>
> cheers,
> DaveK
> --
> Can't think of a witty .sigline today....
>
>
> [*] Actually, I've oversimplified here, just a little. The compiler
> infrastructure calls the frontend to generate a tree; it then converts
that
> tree to a second internal representation known as RTL; that RTL is then
> passed to the backend which generates sequences of assembler instructions
> corresponding to it.
>
>
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
- Raw text -