Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
From:	"Dave Korn" <dk AT artimi DOT com>
To:	<cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Subject:	RE: (now OT) cygwin processes and system'ed processes using 100% CPU
Date:	Wed, 28 Jan 2004 13:40:09 -0000
MIME-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<NUTMEGlT2NqFJ3sl3xb00000038@NUTMEG.CAM.ARTIMI.COM>
Message-ID:	<NUTMEGrXIsVu1lhZ40I0000003b@NUTMEG.CAM.ARTIMI.COM>
X-OriginalArrivalTime:	28 Jan 2004 13:40:08.0125 (UTC) FILETIME=[3E6D3ED0:01C3E5A4]

 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: cygwin-owner On Behalf Of Dave Korn

  I mis-spoke and must correct myself, despite the massive o-t-ness of this
thread :

>   In doing so, he completely ignores the *third* option, 
> "Reply to just the list" - in fact, such an option is not 
> mentioned once anywhere in the article.

  Actually, it is mentioned, but he conflates "Reply to the entire list"
with "Reply to the list AND the author" and ignores the duplicated messages
that implies.  My bad.  His too, though.  Don't think it substantially
affects most of the rest of what I wrote.


    cheers, 
      DaveK
-- 
Can't think of a witty .sigline today....


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -