delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi   search  
Mail Archives: cygwin/2004/01/26/14:13:42

Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Reply-To: Cygwin List <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Message-Id: <6.0.1.1.0.20040126140514.03d08fa8@127.0.0.1>
X-Sender:
Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2004 14:12:55 -0500
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
From: Larry Hall <cygwin-lh AT cygwin DOT com>
Subject: Re: ssh configuration that is pulling my hair out!
In-Reply-To: <20040126184150.GC15847@redhat.com>
References: <6 DOT 0 DOT 1 DOT 1 DOT 0 DOT 20040126123546 DOT 03cde5b0 AT 127 DOT 0 DOT 0 DOT 1> <NUTMEG8NYpyBnSrurDf00000017 AT NUTMEG DOT CAM DOT ARTIMI DOT COM> <20040126184150 DOT GC15847 AT redhat DOT com>
Mime-Version: 1.0

At 01:41 PM 1/26/2004, Christopher Faylor you wrote:
>On Mon, Jan 26, 2004 at 06:34:29PM -0000, Dave Korn wrote:
>>>-----Original Message-----
>>>From: cygwin-owner On Behalf Of Larry Hall
>>
>>>Otherwise, adding what should be obvious to the FAQ isn't going to pass
>>>muster.  The FAQ isn't the place for the obvious.
>>
>>AYS?  The FAQ is the place for _frequently_ asked questions, and I've
>>always assumed that frequency of questions is orthogonal to whether
>>they're obvious or not[*].  After all, its whole raison d'etre is to
>>save the list the bother of having to repeatedly answer the same
>>questions that come up time after time after time....  Surely that's
>>justification for putting any question (no matter how obvious the
>>answer) in the FAQ solely on the grounds of how often it crops up?
>>
>>OTOH 'frequently' in this context should imply 'asked by a variety of
>>different people', rather than 'asked by one person repeatedly'....  ;)
>
>I think you're missing the point.  Larry apparently doesn't understand
>(and neither do I) the thought process which, for example, would cause a
>person who bought coffee that was to hot to complain at Starbucks when
>the coffee was bought at Krispy Kreme.
>
>Larry was asking for some insight into the thought process so that the
>potential FAQ entry could pinpoint the problem.  It's not obvious what
>the problem could possibly be here so adding empty obvious words is
>not going to be much use.
>
>I actually suspect that this is one of many cases where a FAQ entry
>would be of little help and I'm always wary of adding so much verbiage
>to the FAQ that it becomes unusable.


Precisely.  The idea of adding to the  FAQ for something that should be 
obvious goes against my grain but I'm OK with the notion if doing so 
addresses a problem.  But, at least to me, this one seems way off to one
end of "obviousness" so I have to question the "obvious" solution too.
Maybe there's a better solution because the problem isn't what we think
it is.


--
Larry Hall                              http://www.rfk.com
RFK Partners, Inc.                      (508) 893-9779 - RFK Office
838 Washington Street                   (508) 893-9889 - FAX
Holliston, MA 01746                     


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -


  webmaster     delorie software   privacy  
  Copyright © 2019   by DJ Delorie     Updated Jul 2019