Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Message-Id:	<200401240045.i0O0joqd006305@guild.plethora.net>
From:	seebs AT plethora DOT net (Peter Seebach)
Reply-To:	seebs AT plethora DOT net (Peter Seebach)
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: printf does not print long long ints properly
In-reply-to:	Your message of "Sat, 24 Jan 2004 01:41:30 +0100." <opr1877gqc89ubik@smtp.wp.pl>
Date:	Fri, 23 Jan 2004 18:45:50 -0600
X-IsSubscribed:	yes

In message <opr1877gqc89ubik AT smtp DOT wp DOT pl>, =?iso-8859-2?B?RGFuaWVsIEplbGnxc2tp?=
 writes:
>I am using gcc 3.3.1
>the same code works nicely on linux machine with gcc 3.3.1

>is any other information necessary?

What happens if you use %lld, which is what the standard specifies for long
long, instead of the L flag, which is for "long double"?

-s

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -