Mail Archives: cygwin/2004/01/21/12:42:02
On Wed, Jan 21, 2004 at 12:33:40PM -0500, Larry Hall wrote:
>There's no need. As Chris Faylor has said in the past, we'll be moving
>away from this pseudo-device emulation. That's a better resolution to the
>problem than perpetuating the current workaround.
AFAIK, mknod even works now... The problem is, though, that it is bound
to be slower to use a disk-based /dev directory than the current in-memory
version. So, the real solution is probably some kind of devfs or udev method,
like linux.
cgf
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
- Raw text -