delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
Mailing-List: | contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm |
List-Subscribe: | <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Archive: | <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/> |
List-Post: | <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Help: | <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs> |
Sender: | cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com |
Mail-Followup-To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
Delivered-To: | mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
X-Spam-Filter: | check_local AT alphatech DOT com 4.4(020923:1754) http://digitalanswers.org/ |
To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
Newsgroups: | gmane.os.cygwin |
Subject: | Re: cygwin without Win32 |
Reply-To: | sds AT gnu DOT org |
X-Attribution: | Sam |
X-Disclaimer: | You should not expect anyone to agree with me. |
From: | Sam Steingold <sds AT gnu DOT org> |
Organization: | disorganization |
References: | <NUTMEGJpaZQy0etsPAt0000015a AT NUTMEG DOT CAM DOT ARTIMI DOT COM> <Pine DOT GSO DOT 4 DOT 56 DOT 0401200822300 DOT 14918 AT slinky DOT cs DOT nyu DOT edu> <20040120171336 DOT GB25428 AT redhat DOT com> |
Date: | Tue, 20 Jan 2004 12:44:38 -0500 |
Message-ID: | <uk73mpla1.fsf@gnu.org> |
User-Agent: | Gnus/5.1003 (Gnus v5.10.3) Emacs/21.3.50 (windows-nt) |
In-Reply-To: | <20040120171336.GB25428@redhat.com> (Christopher Faylor's message of "Tue, 20 Jan 2004 12:13:36 -0500") |
MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
Posted-To: | gmane.os.cygwin |
The following message is a courtesy copy of an article that has been posted to gmane.os.cygwin as well. > * Christopher Faylor <pts-ab-crefbany-ercyl-cyrnfr AT pltjva DOT pbz> [2004-01-20 12:13:36 -0500]: > >>> > I wonder how close to an approximation of reality a simple >>> > poll/form on the cygwin.com front page would generate? >>> >>> I wonder if running a script across the list archive to extract >>> all the cycheck output and counting the different systems that way >>> would produce a result with any meaning to it at all? >> >>Perhaps only which systems have more problems (or which systems have more >>consciencious users that actually read <http://cygwin.com/problems.html>). > > I guess I'll keep making the observation that any poll would be > worthless as long as people seem to be ignoring that fact and still > coming up with alternate ways of polling. download count for setup.exe should be a reliable statistics. > We are not dropping support for older Windows systems. how about the following maintenance nightmare: detect SFU at configure time and use them as detected, then distribute two versions: traditional win32 for older systems and SFU-based for NT-derivatives. -- Sam Steingold (http://www.podval.org/~sds) running w2k <http://www.camera.org> <http://www.iris.org.il> <http://www.memri.org/> <http://www.mideasttruth.com/> <http://www.honestreporting.com> If abortion is murder, then oral sex is cannibalism. -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |