Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
From:	"Dave Korn" <dk AT artimi DOT com>
To:	<cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Subject:	RE: cygwin without Win32
Date:	Tue, 20 Jan 2004 17:36:03 -0000
MIME-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<20040120171336.GB25428@redhat.com>
Message-ID:	<NUTMEGhvfPAZScXrbw800000167@NUTMEG.CAM.ARTIMI.COM>
X-OriginalArrivalTime:	20 Jan 2004 17:36:05.0601 (UTC) FILETIME=[E1A2A510:01C3DF7B]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: cygwin-owner On Behalf Of Christopher Faylor

> I guess I'll keep making the observation that any poll would 
> be worthless as long as people seem to be ignoring that fact 
> and still coming up with alternate ways of polling.

  AFAIC the discussion has long since left behind any pretence of real-world
relevance and become a purely academic oh-I-wonder kind of thing about what
the actual balance of NT series vs. 9x series cygwin users.

> We are not dropping support for older Windows systems.

  Nothing I have said should be taken as condoning that option in any way.
Hell, dropping support for 9x is the sort of low-down dirty thing that only
someone like... oh, say, Microsoft... would consider doing...


    cheers, 
      DaveK
-- 
Can't think of a witty .sigline today....


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -