Mail Archives: cygwin/2004/01/19/12:03:29
Hold up... I changed mirror sites and now I'm getting a big fat download. I
guess the mirror I used hadn't caught the new release yet. I'm still
downloading, but I figure this will solve the problem.
Sorry.
-----Original Message-----
From: Mija Gourlay [mailto:mijagourlay AT earthlink DOT net]
Sent: Monday, January 19, 2004 11:59 AM
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: INT64_MAX incorrectly defined in stdint.h
I noticed that the release notes for today's new release claims the following:
- Correctly define *64_MAX. (Corinna Vinschen)
I have the latest version, as far as I know, since I ran "update" today.
First, I noticed no change to stdint.h. Second, I noticed that INT64_MAX is
still incorrectly defined:
stdint.h:79:#define INT64_MAX (9223372036854775807)
This literal should have a "LL" suffix. Otherwise, compiling the following
code generates an error:
int64_t i64Max = INT64_MAX ;
warning: integer constant is too large for "long" type
So... I'm confused. Has stdint.h been updated? If so, why didn't I get it
today when I updated Cygwin? If not, where, exactly, did the *64_MAX macros
get "correctly defined", as the release notes indicate?
Thanks.
______________________
Dr. Michael J. Gourlay
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
- Raw text -