delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi   search  
Mail Archives: cygwin/2004/01/15/12:50:10

Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
X-Authentication-Warning: eos.vss.fsi.com: ford owned process doing -bs
Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2004 11:49:35 -0600 (CST)
From: Brian Ford <ford AT vss DOT fsi DOT com>
X-X-Sender: ford AT eos
To: Dave Korn <dk AT artimi DOT com>
cc: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: RE: CVS b0rked?
In-Reply-To: <NUTMEGZAcHmAf3vuhoE00000130@NUTMEG.CAM.ARTIMI.COM>
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.58.0401151141220.23399@eos>
References: <NUTMEGZAcHmAf3vuhoE00000130 AT NUTMEG DOT CAM DOT ARTIMI DOT COM>
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Note-from-DJ: This may be spam

On Thu, 15 Jan 2004, Dave Korn wrote:

> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Brian Ford [snip]
> > Sent: 15 January 2004 17:07
> > To: Dave Korn
> > Cc: Cygwin [snip]
> > Subject: RE: CVS b0rked?
> >
Please don't include plain text email addresses in the body of messages.
They are food for spam harvesters.  I imagine this was just an oversight
as I think I have seen you remove them before?

> Brian Ford wrote:
> > On Thu, 15 Jan 2004, Dave Korn wrote:
> >
> > > Ah, thanks for clearing that up.  I just updated and now it's much
> > > healthier:
> > >
> > [snip]
> > > FAIL: pthread/cancel11.c (execute)
> > >
> > I don't see this one on NT4.
> >
>   I repeated 'make check', and it repeated.  I've just done a cvs update and
> nothing changed except strdup in libiberty, so I'm up-to-date.  The main
> quirk of my setup is that I'm running on the 20040103 snapshot of the cygwin
> dll.  I could try blowing away my build dir and starting again with the
> release version of the dll instead, just to see if it makes a difference
> ...?
>
There should be no reason to rebuild under a different Cygwin DLL version.
However, if you did not do a clean build as I suggested after CGF fixed
the CVS tree, I would again recommend it.

You could try to debug it :).

-- 
Brian Ford
Senior Realtime Software Engineer
VITAL - Visual Simulation Systems
FlightSafety International
Phone: 314-551-8460
Fax:   314-551-8444

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -


  webmaster     delorie software   privacy  
  Copyright © 2019   by DJ Delorie     Updated Jul 2019