Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Date:	Sun, 11 Jan 2004 15:08:58 -0500
From:	Christopher Faylor <cgf-no-personal-reply-please AT cygwin DOT com>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: Unix pipes implemented successfully
Message-ID:	<20040111200858.GA18960@redhat.com>
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<55216 DOT 212 DOT 0 DOT 200 DOT 4 DOT 1073846861 DOT mtc AT mail DOT moldtelecom DOT md> <6 DOT 0 DOT 1 DOT 1 DOT 0 DOT 20040111140418 DOT 037e01f8 AT 127 DOT 0 DOT 0 DOT 1> <55258 DOT 212 DOT 0 DOT 200 DOT 4 DOT 1073851049 DOT mtc AT mail DOT moldtelecom DOT md>
Mime-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<55258.212.0.200.4.1073851049.mtc@mail.moldtelecom.md>
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.4.1i
X-IsSubscribed:	yes
Reply-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

On Sun, Jan 11, 2004 at 09:57:29PM +0200, linamat AT moldtelecom DOT md wrote:
>>Sorry, but no.  The CVS version of cygwin already has a stub of a fifo
>>implementation and the device/fhandler stuff is much different than
>>1.5.5.
>
>But if I change the patch to be compliant with last CVS, should you change
>the answer?

Sorry but it's unlikely.  As I said, there is already a start of an
implementation for this which I am unlikely to want to throw out.

I expect to have a working fifo implementation in a couple of releases.
It's the next thing I'll work on after fixing the signal/thread problems
in the current CVS.

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -