Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
X-Envelope-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Message-ID:	<55258.212.0.200.4.1073851049.mtc@mail.moldtelecom.md>
In-Reply-To:	<6.0.1.1.0.20040111140418.037e01f8@127.0.0.1>
References:	<55216 DOT 212 DOT 0 DOT 200 DOT 4 DOT 1073846861 DOT mtc AT mail DOT moldtelecom DOT md> <6 DOT 0 DOT 1 DOT 1 DOT 0 DOT 20040111140418 DOT 037e01f8 AT 127 DOT 0 DOT 0 DOT 1>
Date:	Sun, 11 Jan 2004 21:57:29 +0200 (EET)
Subject:	Re: Unix pipes implemented successfully
From:	linamat AT moldtelecom DOT md
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
User-Agent:	Moldtelecom Mail System
MIME-Version:	1.0
Note-from-DJ:	This may be spam

>Sorry, but no.  The CVS version of cygwin already has a stub of a fifo
>implementation and the device/fhandler stuff is much different than
>1.5.5.

But if I change the patch to be compliant with last CVS, should you change
the answer?

With respect,
Sergey Samsi
Internet service
S.A. Moldtelecom
(+373)22542597
GSM: 69115719


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -