Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Date:	Wed, 7 Jan 2004 13:14:21 -0500
From:	Christopher Faylor <cgf-no-personal-reply-please AT cygwin DOT com>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: Oh dear, pthreads and stdio still not mt-safe :-(
Message-ID:	<20040107181421.GD14105@redhat.com>
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<NUTMEGOngNqOwUx9Etk000000db AT NUTMEG DOT CAM DOT ARTIMI DOT COM>
Mime-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<NUTMEGOngNqOwUx9Etk000000db@NUTMEG.CAM.ARTIMI.COM>
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.4.1i
X-IsSubscribed:	yes
Reply-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

On Wed, Jan 07, 2004 at 05:47:31PM -0000, Dave Korn wrote:
>Hi everyone (and Arash in particular!),
>
>Re: my earlier message [at
>http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/2004-01/msg00072.html ]
>
>  Well, I thought the latest snapshot had solved my problem with stdio
>getting messed up by threads, but there's still a bug in there somewhere.

We are missing a pthreads maintainer at the moment so it isn't likely that
this will be fixed anytime soon.

FYI,
cgf

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -