Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Date:	Sat, 3 Jan 2004 19:41:33 -0500
From:	Christopher Faylor <cgf-no-personal-reply-please AT cygwin DOT com>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: new snapshot with some tty/WinMe fixes
Message-ID:	<20040104004133.GA11445@redhat.com>
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<3 DOT 0 DOT 5 DOT 32 DOT 20040103181628 DOT 00835c70 AT incoming DOT verizon DOT net> <20040103181903 DOT GA9424 AT redhat DOT com> <3 DOT 0 DOT 5 DOT 32 DOT 20040103181628 DOT 00835c70 AT incoming DOT verizon DOT net> <3 DOT 0 DOT 5 DOT 32 DOT 20040103191807 DOT 00839100 AT incoming DOT verizon DOT net>
Mime-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<3.0.5.32.20040103191807.00839100@incoming.verizon.net>
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.4.1i
X-IsSubscribed:	yes
Reply-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

On Sat, Jan 03, 2004 at 07:18:07PM -0500, Pierre A. Humblet wrote:
>>I could be wrong but I don't recall saying that I'd fixed that problem.
>
>You are right, you said: "I tried all of the test cases that Pierre
>previously reported but I'm sure I missed one." So I looked for the
>one.

Yes, you caught me on semantics.  I was trying to convey that I hoped
I hadn't broken anything new.

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -