Mail Archives: cygwin/2003/12/27/11:30:12
Christopher Faylor wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 26, 2003 at 05:37:36PM +0100, Philippe Torche wrote:
>
>>Christopher Faylor wrote:
>>
>>>The subject says it all.
>>>
>>>I'm hoping to release cygwin 1.5.6 shortly after Christmas.
>>
>>I've tested it (CVS version 12:35 GMT + 1) on our 4 Xeon on W2003S and
>>unfortunately my previous test case (run_t.sh and t.sh) always fails.
I've replace bash with sh and no problem anymore (not have wait enough
maybe) ! A bash bug ?
>
>
> Let me be extremely clear about this again: I don't have a 4 Xeon
> processor running W2003S. I will not be able to test this and I,
> frankly, don't care much about this corner case -- especially if it is
> not a regression from previous releases.
>
> So, if you were just reporting this as a data point, then thanks. If
> you are expecting me to do something about it, then, you will,
> unfortunately, be disappointed.
:-( Not you but other maybe ! If you show old threads, I'm not alone
with this problem ! I can't give access to a multi CPU computer (client
machine), but maybe somebody can ?
>
>
>>The test suite runs soon happily (except now 3 cases) with my Athlon on
>>WinXP, and I'm preparing to run it tomorrow on our 4 Xeon.
:-) The test case give me the same result
>
>
> I think I will have to give a gold star to the person who figures out
> why those three cases are "failing". It really isn't that hard.
>
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
- Raw text -