delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi   search  
Mail Archives: cygwin/2003/12/24/18:28:10

Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Date: Wed, 24 Dec 2003 18:27:59 -0500
From: Christopher Faylor <cgf-no-personal-reply-please AT cygwin DOT com>
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: Please try the latest snapshot -- it is close to cygwin 1.5.6
Message-ID: <20031224232759.GA12748@redhat.com>
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References: <20031224152951 DOT GA34487383 AT hpn5170x> <20031223222816 DOT GA23935 AT redhat DOT com> <20031224152951 DOT GA34487383 AT hpn5170x> <3 DOT 0 DOT 5 DOT 32 DOT 20031224181524 DOT 007c21c0 AT incoming DOT verizon DOT net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <3.0.5.32.20031224181524.007c21c0@incoming.verizon.net>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

On Wed, Dec 24, 2003 at 06:15:24PM -0500, Pierre A. Humblet wrote:
>At 11:59 AM 12/24/2003 -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>>On Wed, Dec 24, 2003 at 10:29:51AM -0500, Pierre A. Humblet wrote:
>>>On Tue, Dec 23, 2003 at 05:28:16PM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>>>> The subject says it all.
>>>> 
>>>> I'm hoping to release cygwin 1.5.6 shortly after Christmas.
>>>
>>>On WinMe the queue runner forked by the exim daemon still occasionally 
>>>produces a popup indicating an error in Cygwin1.dll
>>
>>"a popup indicating an error".......?
>>
>>Not too helpful.
>
>It has happened once more, but differently. ps shows the child as defunct.
>Sysinternals shows everything normal, pinfo exists in the child.
>There is no fork failure, in fact the one I mentioned earlier is the only
>one out of 17070 runs. 
>
>This time when I killed the daemon (just to see), I got
> 330495 [main] exim 34658275 proc_subproc: couldn't get proc lock.
>Something is wrong.
> 330520 [main] exim 34658275 proc_subproc: couldn't get proc lock.
>Something is wrong

If you have the time could you add some more debugging output to the
failing cases that lead to this message and try running it with that?

cgf

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -


  webmaster     delorie software   privacy  
  Copyright © 2019   by DJ Delorie     Updated Jul 2019