delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
Mailing-List: | contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm |
List-Subscribe: | <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Archive: | <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/> |
List-Post: | <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Help: | <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs> |
Sender: | cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com |
Mail-Followup-To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
Delivered-To: | mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
From: | "Gabriel SOUBIES" <gabriel DOT soubies AT thales-is DOT com> |
To: | <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com> |
Subject: | RE: Unable to compile cygwin |
Date: | Tue, 23 Dec 2003 11:57:59 +0100 |
Message-ID: | <BCELLMLNMKLBEEMIBLGDCEPCCHAA.gabriel.soubies@thales-is.com> |
MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
In-Reply-To: | <20031223045751.GB10202@redhat.com> |
X-IsSubscribed: | yes |
I am still not able to build Cygwin from the latest CVS sources... But anyway, that's only a part of the problem. My boss wants to be sure there is no malicious code in the Cygwin distribution I use. So he's telling me to rebuild it from scratch from the CVS sources. His logic is that since we can look into the sources and check that there is no malicious code in it, if we build a version from these sources, we can assume they contain no trojan or whatever. But if I understood correctly, I must use Cygwin to rebuild the sources. When I told him that, he went all mad and told me that he could not trust my version of Cygwin to rebuild these sources, since it could 'insert' malicious code without us knowing it even though the sources are perfectly clean. So my question is: Is it possible to rebuild Cygwin without Cygwin? -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |