Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
From:	Shankar Unni <shankarunni AT netscape DOT net>
Subject:	Re: Unable to compile cygwin
Date:	Mon, 22 Dec 2003 11:15:34 -0800
Lines:	13
Message-ID:	<bs7ft7$s4$1@sea.gmane.org>
References:	<BCELLMLNMKLBEEMIBLGDEEOOCHAA DOT gabriel DOT soubies AT thales-is DOT com> <20031222164832 DOT GC2545 AT redhat DOT com> <bs7c1p$ob0$1 AT sea DOT gmane DOT org>
Mime-Version:	1.0
X-Complaints-To:	usenet AT sea DOT gmane DOT org
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.6b) Gecko/20031205 Thunderbird/0.4
In-Reply-To:	<bs7c1p$ob0$1@sea.gmane.org>

Jim Ramsay wrote:

> Ha!  Ask that boss to prove to you that there is no security problem 
> running Windows on a 'secure' network.

To a person with that mentality, Bill Gates is implicitly trustworthy 
(i.e. if he says it's true, it must be true by definition, because it's 
a "big company that stands by its products"), while anything Open Source 
is written by h4x0rs and thus must "prove its trustworthiness".

How, you ask them? They don't know, but you'd better "know".  No point 
arguing with them..



--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -