Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Date:	Mon, 15 Dec 2003 10:00:51 -0500
From:	Christopher Faylor <cgf-no-personal-reply-please AT cygwin DOT com>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: Problems with 14th Dec cygwin1.dll snapshot
Message-ID:	<20031215150050.GE16074@redhat.com>
Reply-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<BAY9-F22aYve5T7HVr5000144b8 AT hotmail DOT com>
Mime-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<BAY9-F22aYve5T7HVr5000144b8@hotmail.com>
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.4.1i

On Mon, Dec 15, 2003 at 08:24:13AM +0000, Arash Partow wrote:
>not helpful, in the future please be a bit more constructive
>with your comments

Don't you feel just a *tad* bit hypocritical here?

http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/2003-12/msg00512.html

>On Mon, Dec 15, 2003 at 06:31:05AM +0000, Marcus Van Der Beek wrote:
>>Is it me or is the cygwin1.dll becoming more unstable each passing day?

To answer the question: It's you.  You obviously don't understand that
a snapshot is not a release and that things can become unstable during
standard development.

cgf

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -