Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
X-Authentication-Warning:	eos.vss.fsi.com: ford owned process doing -bs
Date:	Mon, 8 Dec 2003 14:17:37 -0600 (CST)
From:	Brian Ford <ford AT vss DOT fsi DOT com>
X-X-Sender:	ford AT eos
To:	Cygwin General Discussion <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>,
	"David A. Cobb" <superbiskit AT cox DOT net>
Subject:	Re: Problems with setup handling of gcc-core & gcc-testsuite
In-Reply-To:	<3FD4DAAE.1060006@cox.net>
Message-ID:	<Pine.GSO.4.58.0312081410590.28297@eos>
References:	<3FD20E5D DOT 60109 AT cox DOT net> <Pine DOT GSO DOT 4 DOT 58 DOT 0312081223000 DOT 28297 AT eos>
	<3FD4DAAE DOT 1060006 AT cox DOT net>
MIME-Version:	1.0

On Mon, 8 Dec 2003, David A. Cobb wrote:
> Brian Ford wrote:
> >On Sat, 6 Dec 2003, David A. Cobb wrote:
> >>I couldn't find this in the archives, but the two packages gcc-core &
> >>gcc-testsuite, which are distinguished by being source-only,
> >>never get registered as "installed."  Setup has now re-installed them
> >>about 6 times.  I know, I don't need to select them; however,
> >>I figured there was some likelihood they weren't correctly installed the
> >>previous time.
> >>
> >They get selected automatically if one just chooses all->install as I
> >usually do.
> >
> >It is an outstanding bug that has been reported several times in various
> >guises.  See this thread for one of them:
> >
> >http://www.cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2003-11/msg00536.html
> >
> >AFAIK, no one seems to care enough to fix it.
> >
> Well, I read that.  It doesn't sound like the same thing.
>
Ok.  How `bout this guise?

http://www.cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2003-11/msg00008.html

> The first time I saw it, I explicitly selected "Install" the gcc-core.
> However, it keeps showing up as something to be installed.
> It still shows with the "new or omitted" packages view.
> My hypothesis is that, because it is a source-only package, setup never
> records it in INSTALLED.DB (?).
> Hey, I can probably edit the database myself - I'm pretty sure it's
> text.  But that wouldn't solve the perceived problem.
>
I think you are correct, and I think the usual way to fix this is with a
dummy, empty binary package as discussed above.  I don't think there was
an outcome, though.

-- 
Brian Ford
Senior Realtime Software Engineer
VITAL - Visual Simulation Systems
FlightSafety International
Phone: 314-551-8460
Fax:   314-551-8444

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -