Mail Archives: cygwin/2003/12/07/21:07:00
Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> Thanks for the patch. I'm sorry but it's not quite clear to me what
> the second part of the patch is doing? Could you give a short explanation
> why it returns at that point if sawSomething is 0?
As the line is traversed, sawSomething gets 0 at every comma and 1 at
every other non-space. At the point you mention, the end of the line has
been reached and the remainder of the function records the address since
the last comma. But if sawSomething==0 (i.e., the comma ended the line)
that address would be ""; including that as a recipient has undesired
consequences, so the patch causes a return instead.
> Oh, btw., Chris is right. It would be nice if you could adhere to
> the formatting rules of the surrounding source.
Thank you both for alerting me to this, I will pay more attention to it in
the future.
> Are you interested in maintaining that new version? It seems to
> address the multiple recipient problem already, AFAICT. It would
> probably just need a Makefile tweak and the small patch from Enoch Wu,
> which allows to send to a server listening on other ports than 25.
I would be happy to, but be aware that it will almost certainly be a
couple of weeks before I look at it---so if anyone else wants at it, I
encourage them.
Robert
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
- Raw text -