Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Reply-To:	Cygwin List <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Message-Id:	<6.0.1.1.0.20031203122259.03524a88@127.0.0.1>
X-Sender:
Date:	Wed, 03 Dec 2003 12:23:52 -0500
To:	sds AT gnu DOT org, cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
From:	Larry Hall <cygwin-lh AT cygwin DOT com>
Subject:	Re: bug in statfs
In-Reply-To:	<uoeuprfyq.fsf@gnu.org>
References:	<uoeuprfyq DOT fsf AT gnu DOT org>
Mime-Version:	1.0

At 12:03 PM 12/3/2003, Sam Steingold you wrote:
>Hi,
>POSIX specifies struct statfs to contain slots f_frsize, f_flag,
>f_favail, and f_namemax and to be declared in <sys/statvfs.h>:
><http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/007904975/basedefs/sys/statvfs.h.html>
>
>Cygwin defines struct statfs without slots f_frsize, f_flag, and
>f_favail, and with f_namelen instead of f_namemax, in sys/vfs.h (also
>included from sys/statfs.h) and does not come with sys/statvfs.h.
>
>Any change this might get rectified in the nearest future?
>
>Thanks!


I haven't heard of anyone suggesting that they were creating a patch for
this.  Perhaps you want to try?



--
Larry Hall                              http://www.rfk.com
RFK Partners, Inc.                      (508) 893-9779 - RFK Office
838 Washington Street                   (508) 893-9889 - FAX
Holliston, MA 01746                     


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -