Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
From:	Wayne Hayes <wayne AT cs DOT toronto DOT edu>
To:	newlib AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Subject:	Re: [wayne AT cs DOT toronto DOT edu: Cygwin-1.5.5 sscanf on floats: 20 times slower than 2 years ago]
Cc:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Message-Id:	<03Nov17.130546edt.453219-16291@jane.cs.toronto.edu>
Date:	Mon, 17 Nov 2003 13:05:43 -0500

>Since scanf and the floating point arithmetic is implemented in newlib,
>I've redirected this message there.  Does anybody have an idea, what
>could slow down float scanning in sscanf by a factor of 20?

Thanks!  Just to be pedentic, I realized that it's worse than a factor of 20.
My *entire simulation* slows down by a factor of 20; there's significant
other computation in it.  So the scanf slowdown is probably closer to
hundreds of times.  *Something* fishy must be going on.  :-)


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -