Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: cc1plus.exe not included in GCC 3.3.1-3?
From:	Robert Collins <rbcollins AT cygwin DOT com>
To:	Brian Ford <ford AT vss DOT fsi DOT com>
Cc:	Brian P Kasper <Brian DOT P DOT Kasper AT aero DOT org>, cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
In-Reply-To:	<Pine.GSO.4.56.0311131516030.9584@eos>
References:	<OF601B37B9 DOT 27B35145-ON88256DDD DOT 0072D18D AT notes DOT aero DOT org>
	<Pine DOT GSO DOT 4 DOT 56 DOT 0311131516030 DOT 9584 AT eos>
Message-Id:	<1068761532.1109.60.camel@localhost>
Mime-Version:	1.0
Date:	Fri, 14 Nov 2003 09:12:12 +1100

--=-bsvE+INYRlALNZD9cUpd
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Fri, 2003-11-14 at 08:21, Brian Ford wrote:
> However, if you already had the old monolithic gcc package when updating
> to the new separate front end packages, then it is a setup/gcc dependency
> bug and you should have gotten gcc-g++.

What did you put in the setup.hint that makes you think setup would do
version specific dependencies for the *old version* ?

Setup will do per-version dependencies, but it does so *for the target
version*.

Rob
--=20
GPG key available at: <http://members.aardvark.net.au/lifeless/keys.txt>.

--=-bsvE+INYRlALNZD9cUpd
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQA/tAG8I5+kQ8LJcoIRAgrSAJ93j8ci+43d635hl0xORI1FaQcFBgCg0hsK
+omC/poTV/0feRyqDACwe2k=
=6yS3
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--=-bsvE+INYRlALNZD9cUpd--

- Raw text -