Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Message-ID:	<3FB3F920.7020103@fillmore-labs.com>
Date:	Thu, 13 Nov 2003 22:35:28 +0100
From:	Patrick Eisenacher <eisenacher AT fillmore-labs DOT com>
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: cc1plus.exe not included in GCC 3.3.1-3?
References:	<OF601B37B9 DOT 27B35145-ON88256DDD DOT 0072D18D AT notes DOT aero DOT org> <Pine DOT GSO DOT 4 DOT 56 DOT 0311131516030 DOT 9584 AT eos>
In-Reply-To:	<Pine.GSO.4.56.0311131516030.9584@eos>
X-Authenticated-Sender:	eisenacher AT fillmore-labs DOT com
User-Agent:	KMail/1.5.9
Organization:	Fillmore Labs GmbH <http://www.fillmore-labs.com/>
X-Complaints-To:	abuse AT fillmore-labs DOT com

I faced the same problem. Upgrading from the old monolithic gcc to the 
new separate front end packaged ones only gave me gcc-c. I had to 
separately select gcc-c++.

I'm not sure whether this can be classified as a setup dependency bug, 
since you always face this kind of problem when you split up a 
monolithic package into separate smaller ones. Which one(s) do you 
classifiy as the default successor(s)?

Patrick

Brian Ford schrieb:

> On Thu, 13 Nov 2003, Brian P Kasper wrote:
>  
> However, if you already had the old monolithic gcc package when updating
> to the new separate front end packages, then it is a setup/gcc dependency
> bug and you should have gotten gcc-g++.
> 



--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -